methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag bis 2 Tage60-120 min0.5-2 Tage5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
15-2005-1220-500+3-20
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Session Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PrioritySession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tags1 shared
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods