View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Agile Mad Sad Glad |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 15-200 | 3-10 | 8-80 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | RetrospectiveTeamReflection | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |