View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 45–75 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 15-200 | Team members involved | 3-10 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |



