View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() Operations Ivy Lee Method | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | With a restless workday full of too many open items, the method creates radical simplicity. It directs attention to a short sequence instead of a broad, still-open field. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-10 min daily | 45-60 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Daily Priority List, Completion Notes | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | PrioritizationProductivityExecution | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |



