View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() DevOps Incident Timeline Analysis | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() DevOps Blameless Postmortem |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | For an incident with an unclear sequence, the method makes the timeline precisely visible. It separates perception, reaction, and delay so cause and effect become more clearly readable. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | After an incident with damage or a near miss, the method creates a sober field for learning without assigning blame. It directs attention to the course of events, conditions, and effective countermeasures. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-180 min | 1-2 h | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Incident Timeline, Evidence Log, Delay Analysis, Improvement Actions | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Postmortem Doc, Action Items, Timeline |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | IncidentTimelineSite Reliability Engineering | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | Site Reliability EngineeringIncidentLearningReliability |



