methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-120 min1-3 h1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-83-81-51-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanFlywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
GrowthRetentionConversion
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods