View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 90-180 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |