methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Purposedifferent
Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 h45-90 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-81-83-83-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleCATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan
Tagsno overlap
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RiskDecisionSensemaking
Add more methods