View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 1-6 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |



