View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Product Discovery Test Card |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-60 min | 60–90 min | 20-35 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |