methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-60 min1-4 WochenWochen bis Monate je Goal1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-81-63-10Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk rankingExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tags1 shared
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods