View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)OODA LoopSAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method)Delphi Method
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) | ![]() Decision Making OODA Loop | ![]() Architecture SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | SAAM helps teams judge an architecture’s suitability for selected tasks and changes. It is particularly useful for examining modifiability and comparing architecture alternatives with clear reasoning. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional | 15-60 min je Zyklus | Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation | 1-8 | Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Domain functions mapped to components and connections, Quality attributes and evaluation criteria, Typical tasks and their effects on the architecture, Reasoned evaluation or comparison of alternatives | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | ArchitectureChangeAnalysisComparisonQuality | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |



