View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |  Operations Kaizen Event |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Operations PDCA Cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional | 0.5-5 Tage | 1-5 Tage | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation | 4-10 | Nutzertraffic | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments |