Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Family Tree Analysis Iceberg Model Barrier Analysis

Criterion	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Operations Family Tree Analysis	Systems Thinking Iceberg Model	Operations Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring.	The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.	For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Low	Medium
Timedifferent	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	2-4 h	30-60 min	2-4 h
Participantsdifferent	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	2-6	2-10	2-6
Formatsame	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures	Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas	Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic	Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns	Root causeSafetyIncident

Add more methods