Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)4Ls Retrospective After-Action Review Start Stop Continue

Criterion	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Agile 4Ls Retrospective	Operations After-Action Review	Agile Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.	After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.	When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Low	Low	Low
Timedifferent	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	45–75 min	20-45 min	30-60 min
Participantsdifferent	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	Team members involved	3-12	3-12
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop + async	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions	Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary	Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam	LearningOperationsImprovement	RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection

Add more methods