View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Argument MappingSpecification by ExampleArchitecture Decision RecordAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Agile Specification by Example |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60-90 min pro Feature | 15-45 min | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |