View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Decision Making OODA Loop |  Facilitation World Café |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 60-180 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1-8 | 12-100+ | 6-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | LearningDialogueFacilitation |