methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-4 Wochen90-180 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
1-86-30 Experten4-124-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tags1 shared
SensemakingDecisionRationale
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods