methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h90-180 min1-5 Tage15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-84-12Nutzertraffic1-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
SensemakingDecisionRationale
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods