methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h60-90 min30-240 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
1-84-101-64-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentHypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis SummaryCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
SensemakingDecisionRationale
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods