methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of Strategic-Tactical-Operational Planning with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min90-180 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
1-81-34-124-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleADR File, Decision Log, RationalePlanning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact InventoryCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
SensemakingDecisionRationale
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
CadenceGovernanceExecution
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods