View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Facilitation Storytelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 1-3 Tage | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation |