methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of a SWOT matrix with four separated quadrants and marked strategic options.
Business Strategy
SWOT Analysis
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.SWOT Analysis arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats into a compact picture of the situation. It keeps internal capabilities and external influences separate before strategic options emerge from them.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30-60 min15-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-43-121-32-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewSWOT matrix, Strategic options, Action listADR File, Decision Log, RationalePESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic Questions
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
StrategyAnalysisMarketPositioning
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
StrategyMarketAnalysis
Add more methods