methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage45-90 min45-90 min15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-44-124-121-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement ActionsADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods