methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-4 h1-5 Tage60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-43-8Nutzertraffic4-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
RiskDecisionSensemaking
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods