methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage20–45 min1-2 h15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-4Small cross-functional group3-81-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods