methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-5 Tage45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
1-45-12 InterviewsNutzertraffic2-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewInterview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods