methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage60-120 min15-45 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-45-121-31-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityADR File, Decision Log, RationaleContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods