View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture arc42 |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |