methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage60-120 min1-5 Tage15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-42-84-121-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods