methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration of Value Chain Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Value Chain Analysis
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.Value Chain Analysis shows where value is created, costs accrue, and differentiation becomes possible along the process. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a value-chain map and lever list.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-2 hHalf day15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-42-83-81-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportValue Chain Map, Lever ListADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
StrategyBusiness modelDiagnosisAnalysis
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods