View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:arc42Current Reality TreeArchitecture Decision RecordTheory of Constraints Thinking Process
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Constraints Thinking Process |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 2-6 h | 15-45 min | 0.5-3 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Current Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality |



