methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Theory of Constraints Thinking Process.
Systems Thinking
Theory of Constraints Thinking Process
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage2-6 h15-45 min0.5-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-43-81-34-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasADR File, Decision Log, RationaleCurrent Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality
Add more methods