methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-4 h30-180 min30-240 min
Participantsdifferent
1-41-51-61-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault AreaHypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis
Add more methods