methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-4 h20-45 minHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-41-51-8Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods