methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage10-20 min daily15-45 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-411-31-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods