methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage15-45 min30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
1-41-35-12 Interviews5-12 Interviews
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewADR File, Decision Log, RationaleInterview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods