methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min dailyUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter1-3 h45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
1Scrum Team3-10Team members involved
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesImprovement actions, Team agreementsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods