methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min dailyUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorterHalber Tag45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
1Scrum Team5-20Team members involved
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesImprovement actions, Team agreementsSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
ResilienceOperationsIncident
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods