methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily1-3 h15-30 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
12-82-63-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesCause Tree, Evidence Notes, CountermeasuresRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods