methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily1-4 h1-2 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
13-84-122-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods