methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily2-8 h20–45 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
12-8Small cross-functional group2-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods