methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of Futures Wheel with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Futures Wheel
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily60-120 min2-4 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
13-102-63-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFutures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic SignalsBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action BacklogCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
ForesightSystems thinkingSignals
Root causeSafetyIncident
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods