methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily60-120 min45-90 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
12-83-82-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
Add more methods