methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily1-3 Wochen45-90 min1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
14-12 Beobachtungen3-85-20
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsDiary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
UX researchObservationContext
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
UX researchTrackingBehavior
Add more methods