methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily1-3 h15-30 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
15-302-64-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods