View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations ALPEN Method |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Product Discovery User Story Mapping |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When user goals and delivery scope could drift apart, it orders the journey from goal to slice. It makes visible where an MVP can genuinely be cut. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min daily | 1-4 Wochen | 2-4 h | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 3-10 Kunden | 4-10 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Story Map, Release Slices, Backlog Candidates | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | BacklogJourneyPlanningMVP | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |