methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily15-30 min20–45 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
12-6Small cross-functional group3-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods