methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
10-20 min daily15-30 min2-6 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
12-63-82-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Add more methods