View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Storytelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Team API Document | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation |