Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Alignment Mapping Stakeholder Salience Model Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas Stakeholder Mapping

Criterion	Facilitation Alignment Mapping	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas	Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping
Purposedifferent	When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog.	When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	1-2 h	60-90 min	60-90 min	60–90 min
Participantsdifferent	4-12	3-6	3-8	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog	Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap	AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis	StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange

Add more methods